Implement. Integrate. Innovate.
Building seamless financial & practice management systems, to support your growth and success.
Legal technology is changing. You need a finance and practice management system that can keep up. A system that feels like an extension of your team. One that sets you up for success and is constantly evolving to meet your needs.
When your systems feel easy and operate as they should, running your firm gets easier too.
Explore Our Services
When you are starting from scratch, our implementation services allow for consultation, collaboration, negotiation, and implementation of a new finance and practice management system that will transform the way your firm works, for the better.
System Implementation
As your technology or processes change, your systems need to keep up, too. Our system optimization services allow for process review, support, and overall improvements to your existing finance and practice management system, to ensure your firm is getting the most out of your investment.
System OPtimization
About Sync Consulting
We are a legal technology company specializing in the implementation and optimization of financial and practice management systems. We work with law firms across the world to ensure that they are getting the most out of their systems while simplifying the process.
Ways We Can Support You
→ Project Management
→ Application Services and Support
→ Reporting & Intelligence Services
→ Testing & Quality Assurance
→ Business Analysis Consulting
→ Interim Staffing and Backfill Support
→ Integration Design & Testing Solutions
→ Elite 3E Training
It’s Time for a System that Works For You
Client Case Study
Creating Clarity Before Choosing Technology
The challenge? The firm knew its systems were holding it back, but like many firms, it was unclear exactly what needed to change. Over time, disconnected tools, manual workarounds, and inconsistent system adoption had become normal. Teams were working hard, but effort was being absorbed by inefficiency rather than progress. Leadership recognized that selecting a new practice management system was inevitable, yet there was concern about repeating past experiences, choosing software based on features rather than fit, and absorbing cost and disruption without meaningful improvement.